Journal 7
I want to explore
the ideas of Eiseley, Stegner, Merton and Nash. The big theme I pulled from the
work of Eiseley is that humans need to engage with nature more in order to make
“the ordinary” extraordinary. I full heartedly agreed with his statement that
the world can become dull and we often overlook so much of the beauty we are
surrounded by because of our fast paced lives. Some of the best days I have had
are the days where I stand in awe of everything that surrounds me: other functioning
humans, beautiful architecture and buildings, animals, and nature. There is so
much to appreciate, but we become so entitled to what surrounds us. I do think
it is healthy for everyone to have a place where they can get away, but I know
an environment in nature may not be the choice for everyone. For those that do
enjoy the outdoors, it is a sweet opportunity to see how intertwined humans and
nature are. The plants that surround us breathe out oxygen to fill our lungs
and help give us life. The worlds of humanity and nature are so interconnected
that we literally help to sustain life for one another.
Merton further establishes that
nature is needed for self-discovery. He makes the bold statement that “one who
is not alone has not discovered his identity” (548). I would say that alone
time can be feared in our society because being alone with your thoughts too
long is known to produce self-doubt, fear, anxiety, etc. However, I agree that
alone time, particularly alone time in nature, can be extremely fruitful to
process how we actually feel. We are often on such a tight schedule that we are
not able to self-reflect as much as we should. I have noticed this in my own
life. I get so focused on a goal I have that I forget to take the time to think
about why I do the things that I do on a daily basis. I respect that Merton
values alone time, but I would also argue that collectivity is not always
negative; there are a lot of benefits that come from working in group settings.
Furthermore, my favorite part of the
excerpts read for Stegner is the power of silence. He quotes, “in gaining the
lovely and the usable, we have given up the incomparable” (509). The
incomparable is nature in its pristine state. Parts of nature, like lakes, are
often filled with boats, jet skis, and lots of loud noises. Stegner knows how
wonderful a place like the Grand Caynon can be in its state of silence. I see
both flips of the coin here. I understand our commercial use of nature for
activities like skiing, boating, etc. These are things I love to do and I am
grateful they have become apart of my involvement in the outdoor realm.
However, I am an advocate of preserving national parks and places where nature
can still be enjoyed in its more natural and pristine state. However, Nash
presents reasoning and arguments against continued preservation of places like
Yellowstone and Adirondacks. The situation becomes sticky because one can argue
that the only reason for preservation is not to admire and enjoy the natural
beauty but rather to act out in self-interest and preserve the parks for
selfish reasons like financial benefit. Unfortunately, I have never visited a
national park but hope to one day. From my perspective, I do find them
important and I would like to see the government continue to fund them for
future generations.
Comments
Post a Comment