Journal 7

 I want to explore the ideas of Eiseley, Stegner, Merton and Nash. The big theme I pulled from the work of Eiseley is that humans need to engage with nature more in order to make “the ordinary” extraordinary. I full heartedly agreed with his statement that the world can become dull and we often overlook so much of the beauty we are surrounded by because of our fast paced lives. Some of the best days I have had are the days where I stand in awe of everything that surrounds me: other functioning humans, beautiful architecture and buildings, animals, and nature. There is so much to appreciate, but we become so entitled to what surrounds us. I do think it is healthy for everyone to have a place where they can get away, but I know an environment in nature may not be the choice for everyone. For those that do enjoy the outdoors, it is a sweet opportunity to see how intertwined humans and nature are. The plants that surround us breathe out oxygen to fill our lungs and help give us life. The worlds of humanity and nature are so interconnected that we literally help to sustain life for one another.
Merton further establishes that nature is needed for self-discovery. He makes the bold statement that “one who is not alone has not discovered his identity” (548). I would say that alone time can be feared in our society because being alone with your thoughts too long is known to produce self-doubt, fear, anxiety, etc. However, I agree that alone time, particularly alone time in nature, can be extremely fruitful to process how we actually feel. We are often on such a tight schedule that we are not able to self-reflect as much as we should. I have noticed this in my own life. I get so focused on a goal I have that I forget to take the time to think about why I do the things that I do on a daily basis. I respect that Merton values alone time, but I would also argue that collectivity is not always negative; there are a lot of benefits that come from working in group settings.

Furthermore, my favorite part of the excerpts read for Stegner is the power of silence. He quotes, “in gaining the lovely and the usable, we have given up the incomparable” (509). The incomparable is nature in its pristine state. Parts of nature, like lakes, are often filled with boats, jet skis, and lots of loud noises. Stegner knows how wonderful a place like the Grand Caynon can be in its state of silence. I see both flips of the coin here. I understand our commercial use of nature for activities like skiing, boating, etc. These are things I love to do and I am grateful they have become apart of my involvement in the outdoor realm. However, I am an advocate of preserving national parks and places where nature can still be enjoyed in its more natural and pristine state. However, Nash presents reasoning and arguments against continued preservation of places like Yellowstone and Adirondacks. The situation becomes sticky because one can argue that the only reason for preservation is not to admire and enjoy the natural beauty but rather to act out in self-interest and preserve the parks for selfish reasons like financial benefit. Unfortunately, I have never visited a national park but hope to one day. From my perspective, I do find them important and I would like to see the government continue to fund them for future generations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Journal 4- Hoblitzelle Camp

Journal 5

Journal #6